The Legal Aid Agency has updated its Civil Finance Electronic Handbook, which is a document provided to caseworkers to assist them when dealing with assessment and processing of costs. Rather than signalling major changes to approach the amendments mainly focus on providing clearer or additional clarification of certain issues. Page 2 sets out all the amendments that have been made and a number of these relate to making clear where differences arise between CCMS and paper claims. One area that has caused some confusion is which CCMS tasks can be claimed and how much time is likely to be allowed. The general approach taken by the Legal Aid Agency has been that any task that had an equivalent task with paper claims would be allowable and at a similar level to the time expected in paper cases. The updated handbook now includes some guidance at section 2.4 highlighting some of the more common items of preparation and the times that would be likely to be allowed. The guidance could have gone further by also specifically stating the CCMS related items that they consider to be ‘administrative’ and therefore not claimable. A welcome change is the new revised Chapter 16 dealing with rejected claims.
The Legal Aid Agency recently announced some changes to the reject process that would result in more situations being dealt with as priority returns, this is now reflected in this chapter which provides a series of tables showing which reasons would cause a hard reject as compared to those which would be dealt with as priority return. The tables also helpfully separate out paper claims from claims made within CCMS. There are various other amendments including additional guidance on risk assessments by process servers, orders for transcription fees and DNA testing of grandparents. It is recommended that you familiarise yourself with the amendments that have been made.
“"We are really enjoying working with your firm and have found your staff to be excellent and very professional."”
“...I have found them very knowledgeable and full of expertise In Legal Aid, Inter partes and High costs cases.
They are always at the end of the phone or email if myself or anyone else in the firm have a billing enquiry and would highly recommend them to any legal firm
“Having instructed Bidwell Henderson since they formed in 2014, I can say with enormous confidence that their Costs Draftsmen are the most knowledgeable, efficient and friendly Costs Draftsmen I have had the pleasure of working with.”
“KK Law have used many cost draftsman firms within the last 10 years but have finally found the firm that is the right fit for us ”
Their service is professional, efficient, accurate and they turn our files around quickly. The Admin, accounts and cost draftsman team are all friendly and knowledgeable.
I would not hesitate to recommend Bidwell Henderson to anyone in the legal profession, they have always gone the extra mile on all of our cases both standard and complex to help expedite our bill payment.
“I would have no hesitation in recommending their drafting and processing services.”
As one of our key strategic partners we have found Bidwell Henderson to be a very forward thinking and highly professional law costs drafting firm. They should be commended on their continual investment in staff training, quality controls and GDPR principles.
Specialising in billing through Tikit P4W they fit with our services portfolio perfectly. They consistently hit the mark first time – demonstrating the quality of their work and professionalism of their team, whilst more importantly improving client cashflow.
“The Bidwell Henderson team are an absolute pleasure to deal with”
The Bidwell Henderson team are an absolute pleasure to deal with as they are all so helpful and accommodating and deliver client focused services to suit business needs.
In addition to providing an efficient, tailored and exceptionally pro-active service – they strike the perfect balance of friendly and professional.